The Rep Team Selection Policy is the official process GCMHA utilizes for placement of Registered players onto Competitive Rep Teams in U9-U11-U13-U15-U18 age divisions. *U7 is considered a developmental program under HPEI. 

1. Purpose of this document. 

1.1 The Team Selection Process (tryout process) is a pivotal stage in the formation of GCMHA teams, where players showcase their abilities, development, and potential. This policy is intended to highlight and effectively communicate the paramount importance of meticulously assessing players' capabilities and ensuring that team composition is rooted in a foundation of proficiency. 

By focusing on skill as the primary criterion through individual, tactical, and gameplay scenarios, evaluations facilitate the assembly of well-rounded teams that can excel in the fast-paced and competitive world of hockey. Skill assessment forms the bedrock of team selection, as it directly influences a player's contributions to various facets of the game.

This emphasis on skill-based evaluation fosters an environment of fairness and meritocracy. Players who have dedicated themselves to honing their abilities are rewarded for their hard work and commitment, inspiring a culture of continuous improvement and dedication within our hockey community. 

The hockey tryout process hinges on the discerning eye of independent evaluators who prioritize skill assessment while being efficiently administered and managed with the help of the Team Genius App. 

This guides the selection of teams that are not only well-equipped for success but also uphold the principles of fairness and merit. As we celebrate the intricate dance of skill, technique, and teamwork on the ice, let us acknowledge and appreciate all players, Coaches, and Evaluators. 

2. Overview of the Team Selection Process 

2.1 The Evaluation Coordinator is an elected person to the GCMHA Executive Board responsible for coordinating and managing all Evaluation Coordinators within GCMHA and reporting to the GCMHA Executive. It is also their role to administer and manage the Team Selection Process each season. 

2.2 An Evaluation Committee, consisting of the members outlined below, will assist with various tasks and duties during the process. Should one of these roles or positions not be filled at the time the Tryout Committee is formed, the President may appoint any member in good standing to the Committee. 

a. Evaluation Coordinator

b. Division Director

 c. President

2.3 During the process, other advisors may be brought in for varying circumstances to ensure the Rep Team Selection Process is completed. 

2.4 The process will be broken into four unique phases. 

Phase 1 –Individual Skill Evaluation (1 session) 

Phase 2 –Tactical Skill Evaluation (1 session) 

Phase 3 – Intrasquad Game Skill Evaluation (3 sessions) 

Phase 4 - Final Tryout Roster Evaluation and Selection (1-3 sessions) 

2.5 All Players are assessed by selected independent evaluators during phases 1-3. Assessment is done only through Team Genius (app), and players are ranked according to position and accumulated scores. The Evaluation Coordinator will create rosters for the Phase 4 Final Tryout Roster Evaluation and Selection. Final Team selection will be completed by the Head Coach assigned to each team for the upcoming season. 

2.6 After 5 sessions, some players will be moved to our Rec Division, which has its own process for ensuring balanced teams based on the number of players in the age group. 

2.7 All players must be registered with GCMHA, and those who desire placement on a Rep Team must participate in the complete Rep Team Selection Process. Any questions in regard to registration can be emailed to gcmhahockeyclub@gmail.com

2.8 Players must identify the position they would like to be considered for at the onset of the Rep Team Selection Process (ie, Forward, Defence, or Goaltender). 

2.9 Goaltenders have their own Individual Skill Evaluation (on-ice session) before joining players for phases 2-3. Assessments are completed with an independent process. 

2.10 Players must identify if they do not wish to be considered for levels that include Body Contact. 

2.11 Parents are not allowed to engage in conversation or seek out information from independent evaluators. 

2.12 Pinnies or Jerseys are provided for every registered player. The numbers provided are the only identifying markers for the player. Evaluators use the Team Genius App to provide evaluations based on the numbered player. Names are not identifiable through the Team Genius App.

2.13 It is mandatory that all players wear plain white, plain black, Falcons, or Abbies socks for the 2025/26 evaluation process. There are to be no rep team/private/spring/camp/school/summer team socks. 

2.14 Players are required to remove any helmet stickers, including private/spring/camp/school/summer teams, to ensure anonymity. 

2.15 Goalies are permitted to leave permanent stickers and artwork on goalie masks.  Removable stickers from private/spring/camp/school/summer teams must be removed

2.16 Players who are not able to participate in Phase 1 or 2 (in whole or in part) may be given an exemption and placed into an appropriate skill level within Phase 3, at the sole discretion of the Evaluation Coordinator, President, and Division Director.  Reasons for these exceptions may include, but are not limited to: 

2.16.1 Conflicts with other sports – If a player wanting consideration for a Rep Team is unable to participate in the Rep Team Selection Process because of scheduling conflicts with other sports, consideration may be given by the Evaluation Coordinator, President, and Division Director: provided that the player demonstrates he or she has made every effort to attend when possible, and that the conflicting sporting event is significant. (i.e., provincial, Atlantic Championships) 

2.16.2 Travel - Should a player not be able to participate in Phase I because of planned travel, consideration may be given by the Evaluation Coordinator, President and Division Director to continue to Phase II, provided that the Evaluation Coordinator is given ample advance notice of the player's intent to miss Phase I 

2.16.3 Illness– Should a player not be able to participate in Phase I because of illness, consideration to allow them to continue onto Phase 3 or 4 may be given upon the presentation of a Doctor’s Letter. 

2.16.4 Injury- If a player is unable to participate in tryouts due to injury or illness. The GCMHA Registrar and Evaluation Coordinator are to be notified as soon as possible, ahead of scheduled tryouts. Parents of players should provide as much detail as possible and any medical prognosis of the injury, focusing on return-to-play guidelines set by a medical professional. Parents/Guardians can include a request for where they feel their child should be placed. Any supporting information is accepted. The return to play date determined by medical professionals must be December 1st. This date is for full participation in league hockey games. This does not include a return to the team for 4 weeks of noncontact drills. Players will be expected to be cleared for game participation by December 1st. For returning players in our association, the Evaluation Coordinator will begin discussions and will include past coaches who are familiar with the player. The Evaluation Coordinator may also designate a current coach or group of coaches to assist in evaluating and determining each unique request. Members of this ad-hoc committee can also reach out to other coaches for feedback. For players who are new to the association, we ask parents/guardians to provide at least 3 references of past coaches who can assist with the GCMHA evaluation. If a comparable or known player exists in our association, then this should be noted and considered. If the information-gathering process leads to a debate as to whether the player should be placed between two levels. The player will be rostered at the lower level being debated. Players who are requested to be automatically placed at a high level should be forecasted as one of the top 3 forwards, top 2 defencemen, or top goalie. If the requested player is comparable to many other players in the tryout process. The injured player may be moved to a lower level. Other contributing factors to the final placement of a player would be the timeline to return to play. Before any return to play, the Head Coach, Evaluation Coordinator, and Registrar need to receive a return to play medical note to ensure the overall safety of the returning player. We recognize that injuries affect the mental health of injured players. In addition, this can also affect other players and teams. Final decisions can negatively impact the perception and narrative amongst members of our association. This is why all players being discussed for rep teams shall be considered right up until teams are finalized. There will be no decisions made before or during tryouts. If there is found to be any misleading information is found or if an attempt to take advantage of the injured status is made, the injured player will be automatically placed in the Rec Division. The GCMHA Executive Board would become involved in any disciplinary consequences as a result. If an injured player is placed on a rep team, the Tryout fee will be added to the cost of registration. This is a result of due diligence and time commitments dedicated to this process. It is only equal and fair to include fees while being evaluated against other players during the Team Selection Process who have paid the fees. This amendment also considers player banks and fundraising commitments. Parents/Guardians of a player being placed on a team will still be responsible for their portion of the team budget. This cannot be prorated. The other families on the team will not be asked to pick up that financial obligation. They would have to sign a parental agreement and fundraise the same as the rest of the team. There is no appeal process for decisions made for injured players. All placements of injured players would be final. 

3. Team Genius App Overview 

3.1 The Team Genius is widely considered the top administrative tool for many minor hockey associations in Canada in delivering a comprehensive team selection process. 

The Team Genius app is designed to aid in hockey tryouts and offers several advantages. 

Efficiency: Traditional tryout processes can be time-consuming and involve manual paperwork, data entry, and communication. Team Genius streamlines these processes by allowing evaluators and administrators to manage tryout registrations, scheduling, and player assessments all in one place. 

Data Collection and Analysis: The app collects and stores data on each player's performance, skills, and selected attributes during tryouts. This data is used for ranking players, determining groups based on those rankings, and finalizing player placement for Final Roster Selections.

Standardized Evaluation: The app provides standardized evaluation criteria, ensuring that all players are assessed fairly and consistently. This reduces potential biases and helps maintain a level playing field for all participants. 

Transparency: Having a digital record of player evaluations and decisions can enhance transparency and accountability within the tryout process. It's important to note that the success of the Team Genius app has a simplified user interface, functionality, ease of use, and overall integration into our existing tryout process. 

Additionally, privacy and data security considerations are crucial when dealing with sensitive player information, which is protected through this app.

4. Evaluators 

4.1 It is the goal of the Team Selection Process to have 5-8 independent evaluators per session, per age group. GCMHA strives to find evaluators who are completely outside the organization to be included in our Team Selection Process. 

4.2 To ensure a high number of evaluators, parent coaches have provided evaluation support in age divisions where they do not have a registered child. 

4.3 Non-Parent Coaches are also used as evaluators. 

4.4 Organizing independent evaluators for minor hockey tryouts entails a multifaceted complexity that extends beyond mere logistical challenges. The process involves identifying qualified individuals who possess a deep understanding of the sport, are devoid of any affiliations or biases towards the participants, and can provide a fair and objective assessment of each player's skills and potential. Coordinating schedules, securing commitments, and ensuring consistency in evaluation criteria across a diverse group of evaluators adds another layer of intricacy. Moreover, fostering an environment of transparency and confidentiality to prevent undue influence becomes imperative. The intricate interplay of these factors underscores the intricate nature of assembling a panel of independent evaluators for minor hockey tryouts, an endeavour that embodies the essence of equitable player selection. 

Utilizing parent coaches as evaluators in minor hockey serves as a pragmatic approach that aligns with the unique dynamics of grassroots sports development. 

4.5 Parent Coaches are used in age divisions with whom they have no affiliation through familial relations. This approach not only streamlines logistics by leveraging existing resources within the hockey community but also fosters a sense of continuity and trust among players, parents, and coaches. However, GCMHA understands how crucial it is to implement clear evaluation guidelines and maintain open communication to mitigate potential biases and ensure a comprehensive and equitable assessment process. Team Genius helps with that. All scoring is audited throughout the process by the Evaluation Coordinator to seek out biased scoring or inconsistencies. 

4.6 When considering the involvement of parent coaches as evaluators in age divisions where their children are not participating, several key measures have been developed. Implemented to uphold fairness, transparency, and credibility in the evaluation process. 

4.7.1 The Evaluation Coordinator shares the Hockey Canada code of ethics and GCMHA evaluation guidelines that emphasize objectivity, fairness, and the avoidance of favouritism. All parent coaches participating as evaluators explicitly agree to adhere to these guidelines. 

4.7.2 Names are never shared, and evaluators do not see any identifying names of the players they are assessing. This helps eliminate unconscious biases and keeps the focus solely on the players' skills and performance. All efforts will be made to assign parent evaluators to a level that is two levels removed from the level of their player. 

4.7.3 All Evaluators go through training with the Team Genius App. These sessions also cover standardized evaluation criteria, scoring systems, and the importance of impartiality.

4.7.4 The Evaluation Coordinator oversees the entire process. Addressing any concerns, ensuring compliance with guidelines, and providing an additional layer of accountability. 

4.7.5 Evaluators will sit separately, spread throughout the rink, and will not have parent interaction during the evaluation session. Evaluators will remain for the entire ice session.

4.7.6 While parent coaches can play a role, they are not the only evaluators. Each Panel has non-parent coaches, former players, or other independent evaluators from outside the organization to ensure a well-rounded assessment. 

4.7.7 By implementing these measures, the involvement of parent coaches as evaluators in age divisions where their children are not participating can be managed in a way that upholds the integrity of the evaluation process and ensures equal opportunities for all players. 

 

5. Scoring Criteria 

5.1 After Phase 3. Players are ranked with weighted scores accumulated from 5 on-ice sessions. Phase 1 – Individual Skill Session (10%) Phase 2 – Tactical Session (15%) Phase 3 – 3 Intrasquad Games (75%) 

5.2 Groups are assigned according to alphabetical order for Phase 1 and Phase 2. Groupings for Intrasquad games are based on accumulated scores from the first 2 sessions. 

5.3 Groupings for games 2 and 3 are adjusted based on scores if player rankings change after each game. 

5.4 Phase 1 –Individual Skill Evaluation (1 session) This session evaluates a player’s individual skills with a series of timed drills and accumulated points for shooting accuracy and shot quality. This portion of the evaluation will account for 10% of the total player score. Scores are collected and entered via the Team Genius App by on-ice coaches. There is a Lead Coach who is responsible for the session. 2 coaches are assigned to each drill. Although Phase 1 is only worth 10% of a player’s total score at the end of 5 sessions, it is worth 40% for creating groupings in Phase 3. 

5.5 Players will be separated into 4 groups after a short warmup. 

5.6 Each player is allowed to complete (and receive a time) for each of the drills. 

5.7 Should a player not be able to complete any drill (i.e., interfered with by another player, 5.8 fallen, etc.), they will be given a 2nd opportunity to restart the drill. 

5.8 At the discretion of the on-ice coaches, stations may be moved to accommodate changing ice conditions. 

5.9 Skating Evaluation (Drill 1) Players will participate in a series of timed evaluation drills for forward and backward skating with and without a puck (4 drills total). 

Skating Forward & Backward

    U9: No Puck. Skate from Goalline to Ringette Line

    U11 - U18: With Puck.  Skate from Goalline to Blue Line

Players will start from a resting position on the goalline and skate the predetermined distance.

Coaches will control the start and record the time for each player

 

5.10 Shooting Assessment (Drill 2) Players will participate in a scored evaluation drill for forehand shooting. 

Players will have 10 shots into a net from the faceoff dot. Pucks have to start from the circle. The player should be lined up looking over the faceoff dot, and not in front. They will be scored per shot. 0 – miss. 1 – Bottom Corner. 2 – Center. 3 - Upper Corner 

Coaches will control the start and completion of the drill (once the coach has counted 10 shots).  

Coaches will also record a score of 1 - 3 for the quality of the shot for their age group. The quality of the shot will be determined by the velocity and accuracy of shot.  1 being below average and below age level, 2 average and age level, 3 above average and age level.

Players can choose whatever shot they prefer for evaluation.

5.11 Agility Weave (Drill 4) Assessment Players will participate in a timed evaluation drill for forward agility skating with a puck. 

U9 - No Puck

U11, U13, U15, U18 - With Puck

Players will start from a resting position and skate forward through the 4 pylons. Coaches will control the start (via whistle) and completion of the drill (once a player has passed the starting blue line), as well as record times for each player for each drill. 

5.12 Agility Transitional (Drill 4)

U9, U11 - No Puck

U13, U15, U18 - WithPuck

Assessment Players will participate in a timed Assessment drill for agility skating (forward and backward with pivoting). 

Players will start from a resting position and skate forward through the 4 pylons (as shown). Pivot at 1st cone and skate backward to cone 2. Pivot back to forward skating towards the top of the circle (3) Both feet must touch the top of the circle with a full stop and then turn and skate forward to cone (4) Pivot to backward skating, and then pivot back to forward at cone 5. Players finish by crossing the goal line. Coaches will control the start and completion of the drill (once a player has passed the starting goal line), as well as record times for each player for each drill. Coaches may retest a player if the app did not record the time correctly due to evaluator error. 

5.13 After Phase 3. Goalies are ranked with weighted scores accumulated from 5 on-ice sessions. Phase 1 – Individual Skill Session (10%) Phase 2 – Tactical Session (15%) Phase 3 – 3 Intrasquad Games (75%) 

5.14 Phase 1 –Individual Skill Evaluation (1 session) This session evaluates a goalies’s individual skills with a series of drills. This portion of the evaluation will account for 10% of the total goalie score. Scores are collected and entered via the Team Genius App by on-ice coaches. There is a Lead Coach who is responsible for the session. 2 coaches are assigned to each drill. Although Phase 1 is only worth 10% of a player’s total score at the end of 5 sessions, it is worth 40% for creating groupings in Phase 3. 

 

5.15 Phase 1 Drills

 

5.16 Phase 2 Goalie Evaluation

    

 

6.0 Phase 2 –Tactical Skill Evaluation (1 session) 

6.1 This portion of the evaluation will account for 15% of a player’s total score. However, it is worth 60% for assigning groups for Intrasquad Game 1. 

6.2 Players are ranked in 4 Drills. Evaluators choose a score of 1-10 for each player during each drill. They have equal merit (25% each) to total 100% for a player's Phase 2 total score. Although at the end of Phase 3, Phase 2 is only worth 15% of a player’s total score. It is worth 60% for groupings for stage 3. 

6.3 The intent is to have up to 6 coaches on ice with a lead/Head Coach leading the entire session and going over the drills for players. 

6.4 Weave Angle Description - X1 will carry the puck wide and try to cut to the net for a scoring chance. X2 will weave around the pylons and angle X1 as they try to cut towards the net. Evaluation Evaluators will qualitatively assess a player’s ability to carry the puck and enter the offensive zone using speed, skill, and creativity for a scoring opportunity. Evaluators will qualitatively assess players' intensity or desire to compete within this drill. Evaluators will qualitatively assess players' overall skill.  X1 will be evaluated for the offensive ability and skills.  X2 will be evaluated for their defensive ability and skills.

6.5 Breakout Pass 1v1. Description • D1 and D2 will start with a puck, on the coach's whistle, they will skate around the net and look for a pass option at the hash marks. • At the same time, F1 and F2 will skate hard to the hash marks to receive a pass. • After the pass is made, F1 will encounter D2 from the other end for a 1v1. F2 and D1 will also have a 1v1 on the other side. Forward Evaluation • Evaluators will qualitatively assess a forward's ability to get into a proper position to receive a pass and then use a combination of speed, acceleration, puck control, physicality, and creativity. • In order to attack the offensive zone against a defender for a scoring opportunity on goal. • Forwards will not be penalized for a missed pass out of their control, interference by other players, or any other reason that may cause the drill to not be completed. Defence Evaluation • Evaluators will qualitatively assess a Defenceman’s ability to make a pass up to a positioned forward along the boards. Then, using a • combination of forward speed, pivot, backward speed, agility, “gap” control, angling, body position/contact in order to defend the defensive zone from an attacking player. Defencemen should not be penalized for a forward’s missed pass, interference by other players, or any other reason that may cause the drill to not be completed. Additionally, under some circumstances, a defenceman may be initially beaten by a Forward. (Who may have started prematurely), but still received a favourable score for chasing and following up on the play. 

6.6 Forecheck / Pass / 2 v 1 Description • Coach will dump a puck into the corner. • First two players X and 0 will race for puck possession and battle 1v1. • The players must control possession and make a direct pass back to their team. Once their teammate receives the pass, they can then pursue a scoring opportunity 2-1. • The drill is completed by a goal or the defensive player skating the puck outside the blue line. • No clearing the puck allowed. Evaluation Forwards /Defence • Evaluators will qualitatively assess a player’s ability to win a puck battle using speed, creativity, and physicality (body contact or angling). In addition, each player's ability to position themselves when not in possession of the puck, as well as a player’s ability to use his/her teammate effectively for the scoring opportunity. • Evaluators will qualitatively assess all 3 players' intensity or desire to compete within this drill with or without the puck. • Evaluators will qualitatively assess all 3 players' overall skill for both sides of the scoring opportunity. 

6.7 1 v 1 Battle X2 Description • On the whistle, X1 and X2 will battle and play keep away in the circle with the puck. • On the second whistle, X1 and X2 will leave the 1st puck where it lies and race for the puck that is spotted at the centre line. The drill finishes with a Shot on goal. Evaluation (Forwards/Defence) All players are evaluated on a single score of 1-10. • Evaluators will qualitatively assess a player’s ability to win a puck battle and keep possession using speed, creativity, and body position. • Evaluators will qualitatively assess both players' intensity or desire to compete within this drill with or without the puck. • Evaluators will qualitatively assess both players' overall skill for both sides of the scoring opportunity. 

6.8 This portion of the evaluation will account for 15% of a goalie's total score. However, it is worth 60% for assigning groups for Intrasquad Game 1. 

6.9 Phase 2 Goalie Evaluation

 

7.0 Phase 3 – Intrasquad Game Skill Evaluation (3 sessions) 

7.1 This portion of the evaluation will account for 75% of a player's score. There are 3 Intrasquad games, and Players receive 5 scores each game from each evaluator for the following criteria. • Hockey Skills (Passing, Shooting, Puck Handling) (20%) • Skating (FWD/BWD, Turning, Pivoting, Stopping, Changing Direction) (20%) • Position Knowledge(Offensive/Devensive positioning based on position)(20%) • Checking & Body Position (Stick Checking/Gap Control/Angling/Body Checking for leagues with contact Ability to initiate and defend Body Contact) (20%) • Hockey IQ (overall has a understanding of the game for appropriate age level, decision making, communication) (20%)

7.2 After the completion of Phase 2. Team Genius ranks all players with 1 being the highest achieved total score. While it depends on the number of players in an age division and the available ice. The Evaluation Coordinator creates 2 sets of rosters for either 2 or 3 intrasquad games. If there are 3 games being played. It is considered that there are 3 groups of players. These 3 groups have 2 teams in each. 

7.3 Rosters are created by evenly distributing (starting with the highest) players across 2 teams for each intrasquad game. (Example – Player A is the highest-ranked player and is rostered on the blue team, the 2nd highest-ranked player goes to the red team 3rd goes to Blue, the 4th goes to Red. Etc. etc.) This process is followed for Forwards and then Defence. 

7.4 The Evaluation Coordinator finalizes and posts the rosters for each game online at the GCMHA Website. 

7.5 After the first intrasquad games are completed within an age division and evaluations are completed for the first set of games, there will be new updated rankings for all players. The same process from 7.3 is re down to create new rosters for the next Intrasquad session. 

7.6 In an effort to ensure player movement between groups, there must be at least 3 players moved between groups. The 3 lowest-ranked players from Group 1 are replaced by the 3 highest-ranked players from Group 2. Please note that an exception can be made, and more than 3 players can be moved between groups if deemed necessary by the Evaluation Coordinator.

7.7 Before the final intrasquad game, returning players who are highly ranked may be exempt and asked not to play in that game to allow more player movement and allow evaluators a chance to focus on remaining players. 

7.8 This portion of the evaluation will account for 75% of a goalie's score. There are 3 Intrasquad games, and goalies receive 5 scores each game from each evaluator for the following criteria. • Positioning & Angling(20%) • Hockey IQ  (20%) • Consistency (20%) • • Hockey IQ (overall has an understanding of the game for appropriate age level) (20%)  • Rebound and Puck Control (20%)

 

8.0 Phase 4 - Final Tryout Roster Evaluation and Selection (2-3 sessions) 

8.1 At the end of Phase 3, the Evaluation Coordinator creates 3-4 Final Tryout Rosters (1 for each rep League) 

8.2 Head Coaches will receive 1-3 Ice times for further evaluation before making final roster selections. The ice times may be exhibition games or just practices. This is dependent on ice time, schedule, and other team availability. 

8.3 Upon the conclusion of Phase 4, the Head Coach will identify to the Evaluation Coordinator, GCMHA Board, and Division Director the six (6) players (3 Forwards, 2 Defensemen, and 1 Goalie) whom he or she wishes to release to the next level. These players will automatically be rostered to the team at the lower level, with exceptions only as approved by the Evaluation Coordinator and GCMHA Executive Board. 

8.4 A If a Coach wishes to roster a player in a position different from what they have identified themselves as trying out for (i.e., selecting a forward to play defense or vise versa) they will need to request approval from the Evaluation Coordinator, GCMHA President, and the GCMHA Division Director.. Roster sizes are determined by HPEI and will be followed by GCMHA.

8.4.1 U9 AA players will choose between Player or Goalie due to U9 playing ½ ice for part of the season and transitioning to full ice later in the season.

8.4.2 U11 AA/A players will choose a preference of Forward, Defense, Goalie and can also choose  “Can play Forward or Defense” as an option for the coach to review before selecting the final roster.

8.5 In a circumstance where a 2nd or 3rd year player who played previously on a team the year prior does not make the Final Tryout Roster via Team Genius (via accumulated scoring), the player will be added for Final Evaluation. Returning players are not guaranteed a spot on the Final Team selection. If a Head Coach is releasing a returning player, this is a decision that must be brought forward to the Evaluation Coordinator. The granting of this permission is at the sole discretion of the Evaluation Coordinator, GCMHA President, and GMCMHA Division Director.

8.6 Players will be notified of successful placement on a rep team or released from the team by the Evaluation Coordinator through the GCMHA website. 

8.7 Coaches may not contact successful player candidates until permitted by the Evaluation Coordinator. 

8.8 Coaches may only contact players from their team with the permission of the Evaluation Coordinator and a released player’s parent or guardian. 

8.9 The number of players assigned to final tryout rosters may be changed to include any exceptions with the approval of the Evaluation Coordinator, which will impact the number of players that need to be released. 

 

9.0 Evaluation Scoring Report

9.1 The Evaluation Coordinator will send out all players' evaluations 48 hours after all Rep Teams' rosters are finalized. The Evaluation will be sent out using the Team Genius platform to the email given by the parent/guardian.

9.2 Player or Player Parent / Guardian may contact the GCMHA Evaluation Coordinator on the following basis: 

9.3 To request information on the Rep Team Selection Policy or process. The Evaluation Coordinator will respond (wherever possible) within 48 hours of the request. 

9.4 Player or Player Parent / Guardian may appeal a decision in written form through the Evaluation Coordinator. The Evaluation Coordinator will have the sole discretion to escalate appeals to the GCMHA Board of Directors. Appeals to other members of the Board of Directors will not be considered and could result in disciplinary action. 

9.5 Appeals will only be entertained for administrative errors. 

 

10 Discipline 

10.1 Any player, Parent / Guardian, Volunteer, or Coach who knowingly contravenes the aforementioned policy may be subjected to a discipline review by the GCMHA Board of Directors. Pending the results of the review, disciplinary action may be taken. This action may include, but not be limited to. 

10.1.1 Disciplinary Letter 

10.1.2 Suspensions – On-ice or Rink suspension 

10.1.3 Removal from a Team Roster 

10.1.4 Actions as determined by the GCMHA Disciplinary Committee. The Evaluation Coordinator will provide (wherever possible) within 48 hours of the request.